Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of the number of online CST calls \(|\text{CC}_{\text{GPR-H}}^{\text{online}}|\) and effective calls \(|\text{EC}_{\text{GPR-H}}^{\text{online}}|\) for the GPR-Hybrid approach with different updating strategies

From: A blackbox yield estimation workflow with Gaussian process regression applied to the design of electromagnetic devices

 

No sorting

EGL criterion

Hybrid criterion

 

\(|\text{CC}_{\text{GPR-H}}^{\text{online}}|\)

\(|\text{EC}_{\text{GPR-H}}^{\text{online}}|\)

\(|\text{CC}_{\text{GPR-H}}^{\text{online}}|\)

\(|\text{EC}_{\text{GPR-H}}^{\text{online}}|\)

\(|\text{CC}_{\text{GPR-H}}^{\text{online}}|\)

\(|\text{EC}_{\text{GPR-H}}^{\text{online}}|\)

\(N_{\text{B}}=1\)

320

320

269

269

254

254

\(N_{\text{B}}=20\)

352

18

299

15

288

15

\(N_{\text{B}}=50\)

378

8

339

7

326

7