 Research
 Open Access
Generalized models for highthroughput analysis of uncertain nonlinear systems
 Thilo Gross^{1, 2} and
 Stefan Siegmund^{2}Email author
https://doi.org/10.1186/2190598319
© Gross, Siegmund; licensee Springer 2011
 Received: 19 September 2011
 Accepted: 12 December 2011
 Published: 12 December 2011
Abstract
Purpose
Describe a highthroughput method for the analysis of uncertain models, e.g. in biological research.
Methods
Generalized modeling for conceptual analysis of large classes of models.
Results
Local dynamics of uncertain networks are revealed as a function of intuitive parameters.
Conclusions
Generalized modeling easily scales to very large networks.
Keywords
 Generalized modeling
 highthroughput method
 uncertain models
 biological research
1 Background
Three different levels of modeling.
 Diagrammatic representation 
$\dot{X}=G(X)L(X)$  Generalized model 
$\dot{X}=\frac{aX}{k+X}m{X}^{p}$  Conventional model 
However, at this stage the knowledge of the system is often insufficient to restrict the processes to specific functional forms. Further, the number of variables in the current models prohibits analytical investigation, whereas simulation does not allow efficient exploration of large parameter spaces.
2 Method
Here we present the approach of generalized modeling. The idea of this approach is to consider not a single model but the whole class of models which are plausible given the available information. Modeling can start from a diagrammatic sketch, which is translated into a generalized model containing unspecified functions. Although such models cannot be studied by simulation, other tools can be applied more easily and efficiently than in conventional models. In particular, generalized models reveal the dynamics close to every possible steady state in the whole class of systems depending on a number of parameters that are identified in the modeling process.
3 Results
In the past it has been shown that generalized modeling enables highthroughput analysis of complex nonlinear systems in various applications [1, 2]. In particular it was shown that generalized models can be used to obtain statistically highlysignificant results on systems with thousands of unknown parameters [3].
4 Discussion
To interpret ${g}_{X}$ and ${\ell}_{X}$ note that for any power law $L(X)=m{X}^{p}$ the elasticity is ${\ell}_{X}=p$. Constant functions have an elasticity 0, all linear functions an elasticity 1, quadratic functions an elasticity 2. This also extends to decreasing functions, e.g. $G(X)=\frac{m}{X}$ has elasticity ${g}_{X}=1$. For more complex functions G and L the elasticities can depend on the location of the steady state ${X}^{\ast}$. However, even in this case the interpretation of the elasticity is intuitive, e.g. the Holling typeII functional response $G(X)=\frac{aX}{k+X}$ is linear for low density X (${g}_{X}\approx 1$) and saturates for high density X (${g}_{X}\approx 0$).
So far we succeeded in expressing the Jacobian of the model as a function of three easily interpretable parameters. A steady state ${X}^{\ast}$ in a dynamical system is stable if and only if the real parts of all eigenvalues of the Jacobian are negative. In the present model this implies that a given steady state is stable whenever the elasticity of the loss exceeds the elasticity of the gain ${g}_{X}<{\ell}_{X}$. A change of stability occurs if ${g}_{X}={\ell}_{X}$ as Equation 1 undergoes a saddlenode bifurcation.
5 Conclusion
The simple example already shows that generalized modeling

reveals boundaries of stability, valid for a class of models and robust against uncertainties in specific models

avoids expensive numerical approximation of steady states and can be scaled to highdimensional models
Also in larger models it is generally straight forward to derive an analytical expression that states the Jacobian of the generalized model as a function of simple parameters. This Jacobian can then analyzed analytically or numerically by a random sampling procedure. Both approaches are illustrated in a recent paper on bone remodeling [4]. Here, the generalized model analysis showed that the area of parameter space most likely realized in vivo is close to Hopf and saddlenode bifurcations, which enhances responsiveness, but decreases stability against perturbations. A system operating in this parameter regime may therefore be destabilized by small variations in certain parameters. Although theoretical analysis alone cannot prove that such transitions are the cause of pathologies in patients, it is apparent that a bifurcation happening in vivo would lead to pathological dynamics. In particular, a Hopf bifurcation could lead to oscillatory rates of remodeling that are observed in Paget’s disease of bone. This result illustrates the ability of generalized models to reveal insights into systems on which only limited information is available.
Declarations
Authors’ Affiliations
References
 Gross T, Feudel U: Generalized models as a universal approach to the analysis of nonlinear dynamical systems. Phys. Rev. E 2006., 73:Google Scholar
 Steuer R, Gross T, Selbig J, Blasius B: Structural kinetic modeling of metabolic networks. PNAS 2006, 103: 11868.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Gross T, Rudolf L, Levin SA, Dieckmann U: Generalized models reveal stabilizing factors in food webs. Science 2009, 320: 747.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Zumsande M, Stiefs D, Siegmund S, Gross T: General analysis of mathematical models for bone remodeling. Bone 2011.Google Scholar
Copyright
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.