 Essay
 Open Access
 Published:
Nanoelectronic COupled problems solutions  nanoCOPS: modelling, multirate, model order reduction, uncertainty quantification, fast fault simulation
Journal of Mathematics in Industryvolume 7, Article number: 2 (2016)
Abstract
The FP7 project nanoCOPS derives new methods for simulation during development of designs of integrated products. It covers advanced simulation techniques for electromagnetics with feedback couplings to electronic circuits, heat and stress. It is inspired by interest from semiconductor industry and by a simulation tool vendor in electronic design automation. The project is ongoing and the paper presents the outcomes achieved after the first half of the project duration.
Introduction
Designs in nanoelectronics often lead to largesize simulation problems and include strong feedback couplings. Industry demands the provisions of variability to guarantee quality and yield. It also requires the incorporation of higher abstraction levels to allow for system simulation in order to shorten the design cycles, while at the same time preserving accuracy. The nanoCOPS FP7 project addresses the simulation of two technically and commercially important problem classes identified by our industrial partners (NXP Semiconductors, ON Semiconductor, ACCO Semiconductor, and MAGWEL):

PowerMOS devices, with applications in energy harvesting, that involve couplings between electromagnetics (EM), heat and stress, and

RFcircuitry in wireless communication, which involves EMcircuitheat coupling and multirate behaviour, together with analoguedigital signals.
To meet market demands, the scientific challenges are to:

create efficient and robust simulation techniques for strongly coupled systems, that exploit the different dynamics of subsystems within multiphysics problems and that allow designers to predict reliability and ageing;

include a variability capability such that robust design and optimization, worst case analysis, and yield estimation with tiny failure probabilities are possible (including large deviations like 6sigma);

reduce the complexity of the subsystems while ensuring that the operational and coupling parameters can still be varied and that the reduced models offer higher abstraction models that are efficient to simulate.
Achieving solutions to these challenges has considerable industrial impact. The overall objective of nanoCOPS is to advance a methodology for circuitandsystemlevel modelling and simulation based on best practice rules to deal with coupled electromagnetic fieldcircuitheat problems as well as coupled electrothermalstress problems that emerge in nanoelectronic designs. The new methods developed are robust and allow for strong feedback coupling when integrating systems to increase the performance of both existing devices and when integrating systems to produce new devices.
First outcomes have been reported in [1, 2]. The project is ongoing and the paper presents the outcomes achieved after the first half of the project duration. Recently, at the DATE2016 conference in Dresden, Germany, we gave dedicated presentations to designers and to engineers with backgrounds in mathematics and in electronics [3–7]. On the project website http://www.fp7nanocops.eu/ special videos have been made available. Here also more publications can be found. The current paper addresses mathematicians and points out how mathematics as essential ingredient for innovation is transfered for successful use in industry.
With the new techniques it is possible to efficiently analyze the effects due to variability. Our methods are designed to solve reliability questions resulting from manufacturability. They facilitate robust design as well as enable worst case analysis. They can also be used to study effects due to ageing. Ageing causes variations in parameters over a longterm period, which cannot be predicted exactly and thus are typically uncertain. The challenges for an Integrated Circuit (IC) are that each device has its own electrical and thermal conditions, which are changing over time (due to ageing, for example). Here, each device has its own required lifetime.
Novel Model Order Reduction techniques, developed here for the fast repeated simulation of the coupled problems under consideration, are applicable to both coupled systems and parameterized subsystems. As such they are an essential ingredient for the Uncertainty Quantification.
In summary, our solutions are

advanced cosimulation/multirate/monolithic techniques, combined with envelope/wavelet approaches;

new generalized techniques in Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) for coupled problems, tuned to the statistical demands from manufacturability;

enhanced, parametric Model Order Reduction techniques for coupled problems and for UQ.
All the new algorithms produced are implemented and transferred to the SME partner MAGWEL. Validation is conducted on industrial designs provided by our industrial partners. These industrial endusers give feedback during the project lifetime, contribute to measurements and supply material data as well as process data. A thorough comparison to measurements on real devices is being made to demonstrate the industrial applicability.
Our consortium brings together extensive R&D experience in nanoelectronic IC simulation and complementary areas of expertise. It includes seven universities, one research institute, two largescale semiconductor companies, and two SMEs, see Table 1.
Progress and results
In this section we give an impression of outcomes achieved in the first half of the project duration. We refer with the abbreviations in Table 1 to the various project partners.
Simulation environment
Electronic devices consist of a large number of components. Many parts are accurately described by a circuit model, whereas semiconductor parts and configurations suffering from electromagnetic interference necessitate the use of field models. The overall behaviour of the device needs to be simulated by a fieldcircuit coupled method. Improvements on such coupled techniques indirectly lead to more reliable and better integrated devices. In order to be able to incorporate the mutual electromagnetic influence of neighboring elements (e.g., cross talking), one needs refined models based on a sufficiently exact discretization of the full Maxwell equations. An interface model for such refined models was derived that can be used for lumped circuit net lists.
A main result, through joint effort by MAG, HUB, FHO, TUD, was the development of a simulation environment, which both enables the cosimulation [8, 9] and monolithic/holistic simulation of a circuit/device system [6] or electricalthermal systems [10], see Figure 1 and Figure 2. The interface, both linear and nonlinear, couples software modules from academia to the device and electromagnetic field simulator from MAGWEL, offering flexibility in adapting modules and allowing for different time integration procedures. In this way, coupling of electronic circuits with electromagnetics and with semiconductor material is achieved. It also allows for statespace formulations of subparts to which Model Order Reduction can be applied. The interface treats the space discretization in the field simulator and generates a system of DifferentialAlgebraic Equations (DAEs). Especially, when including semiconductor material, large differences of magnitude made careful scaling during the assembly essential to guarantee that the overall system was stable [11, 12].
Bondwire modelling and simulation
Nowadays integrated circuits (ICs) are important components of daily life. Moreover, the ever tightening specifications imposed on modern integrated circuits (ICs) by the semiconductor roadmap demand more energyefficient chips which become smaller and smaller in size. Bondwires are commonly used to connect the chip and the pins during device assembling. These wires are heated up due to Joule effects and their temperature. Figure 3 shows a diagram of a classic IC leadframe package. TUD and ONN have focused an improved electrothermal formula that is the basis for a bondwire calculator for ONN [13]. Bondwire temperature can increase substantially since the electric power is supplied through the wires. If the wires cannot properly dissipate this power, then permanent damage will occur to the wires and surrounding material. A mathematical formula has been developed that improves the prediction of this heating compared to known models from literature [14].
Figure 4 depicts a simplified thermal problem upon which the model is built. The rectangular shape of the package compound is retained and suitable boundary conditions (BCs) are used; (1) adiabatic on the rightmost wall except on the wire portion. This facilitates the inclusion of the lead into the model; (2) isothermal on the leftmost and bottom walls amounting to the chip and dieattach temperatures; (3) convective on lateral and upper walls; (4) thermal radiation on the wire surface. The temperature dependence of the wire’s thermal and electrical conductivities is also included. The heat equation is solved by means of an adhoc linearization which involves the compound heat equation and its heat kernel [15], viz.
Above, \({T}_{\mathrm{w}}\) is the wire temperature, \(T_{\mathrm{o}}\) is the reference (ambient) temperature, \(\alpha_{\kappa}\) is the temperature coefficient of the wire thermal conductivity, and \(\widetilde{\theta}_{\mathrm{w}}\) is an auxiliary variable.
Several numerical tests for wires of gold, copper, and aluminium have been performed with data provided by ONN. Numerical verification has been carried out with CST Multiphysics Studio™, and a good agreement has been corroborated. Figure 5 shows the estimated current capacity (temperature vs current amplitude) for a gold wire after \(50\,\mathrm{ms}\). The formula retains important geometrical parameters defining the package, which adds high flexibility. This reduces the overdesign of the wires during fabrication. The evaluation of this formula is computationally inexpensive such that timeconsuming 3D simulation can be avoided. However, a coupling of the bondwire model to a 3D simulator is necessary if the integration in the overall system behaviour should be simulated. Thus, TUD also implemented a nonlinear inhouse simulation code based on the Finite Integration Technique (FIT) to analyze the coupling before transferring the concept to partner MAG [4]. ONN aims to use the algorithm within a GUI (Graphical User Interface).
ONN and BUT made measurements of DC and dynamical fusing of bondwires [16]. ONN fabricated test chips (SOIC package so far), where the individual bondwires with different lengths, diameters and materials have been encapsulated. BUT prepared a complete methodology and experimental setup to do such investigations.
The setup (hardware tester and MATLAB GUI) allows measurements of all six bondwires in one IC package. The tester consists of the 6 independent channels, the 6 driving stages, the 6 Kelvin probe sensing stages, the demultiplexing core for the driving stages (specification of address of the bondwire) and the multiplexing core for the Kelvin probe sensing stages.
The block structure, the single channel operation and photographs of the final hardware solution are shown in Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8. The frequency limitation of the measurement setup is about 500 kHz (limits of the used MOS powerswitches and PCI card). The software part of the project consists of two executable MATLAB scripts with a GUI. MATLAB software is also used for the generation of testing sequences and signals that drive the tester. Finally, the measurements have been used to validate the bondwire formula.
Electrothermal coupled simulation
MAG and ONN cooperated on electrothermal simulation in order to guarantee industrial acceptance. A highlight of this work is that the electrothermal simulation tool is very flexible concerning the various device technologies since the nanoscale transistor architecture is incorporated via compact models. Therefore, it is possible to couple the largescale (millimeter) structures and the smallscale (submicron) of the finger architecture in a single simulation. The computation deals with the coupling of the electrical response and with the thermal response in firstprinciple field solving. Figure 9 illustrates today’s capabilities [10].
Multirate simulations
In coupled problems one often encounters multiscale differences (in space) and large variations in dynamics in timedomain: multirate effects [17]. In this book especially partitions in space with different dynamics lead to couplings between subsets of DAEs. A careful formulation of the coupling is key in being able to guarantee convergent dynamical iterations in a cosimulation. In [9] the partition between physical quantities (electromagnetics, heat) was exploited to study this convergence.
A different kind of multirate occurs in electronic circuits involving oscillators, where a large difference between frequency components can be observed. In the time domain we see a highfrequency carrier signal that is moduled by an envelope signal (in case of amplitude modulation), or where the frequency is modulated (frequency modulation). An additional effect is the occurrence of sudden steep rises and fall of signals. FHO developed a multirate envelope timeintegration technique, which combines decompositions along two time scales, using nonuniform biorthogonal spline wavelets [18]. Emphasis is on performance optimization, including adaptive grids, iterative linear solvers for huge problems (e.g. preconditioned GMRES), optimization of the evaluation of lumped devices (e.g. BSIM3 and BSIM4, MEXTRAM, etc.). Figure 10 shows the divider block diagram for a PLL in the 5.6 GHz ISM band, employing the silicon germanium technology of IHP (a research center funded by the German government). The simulation of frequency dividers is a severe bottleneck for PLL simulation and for the multirate technique in general. In deriving Figure 11, adaptive methods were employed for the different stages of the divider. Table 2 shows the drastic improvement of the run time using adaptivity. No commercial circuit simulator provides this facility yet.
Parametric model order reduction
MPG and MAG developed efficient parametric/parameterized Model Order Reduction (pMOR) methods and techniques for fast simulation of electrothermal coupled models [19, 20] and for fast Uncertainty Quantification [21] of nanoelectronic, electrothermal models with random variables or stochastic processes. Given the system matrices at different values of the parameters or realizations of random variables, we extract system matrices which are independent of the parameters (random variables), so that parametric models can be constructed, and the parameters (random variables) symbolically appear in the model. Reducedorder models of the largescale parametric models are obtained using parametric model order reduction techniques. For general complex geometries, like in Figure 12, an accurate, physical model in the form of heat transfer partial differential equations is required.The electrical transport is controlled by Ohm’s law and the current continuity equation in conductive material
The generatedenergy transport is controlled by Joule’s law
Of particular interest is the local heat generation, which is given by
Here \(\kappa(T)\) is the heat diffusion, \(C_{V}\) is the constantvolume heat capacitance of the material, which is also Tdependent and \(T^{*}\) is a reference or ambient temperature. The latter expression results in a nonlinear relation (coupling) between the variables V, the electrical voltages, and the temperature variables, T. Spatial discretization (using the finiteelement method, or finite volume method, like finite integration) of (2) and (3) results in a largescale system of ODEs in the form of
where x is the state vector including the nodal voltages and nodal temperatures varying with time. The tensor \(\mathcal {F}\in\mathbb {R}^{n\times n\times n}\) represents the nonlinear character of the heat source Σ. Roughly speaking, \(\mathcal {F}\) can be considered as a 3D array of n matrices. Each matrix is in \(\mathbb {R}^{n \times n}\). The matrix \(E \in\mathbb {R}^{n\times n}\) is a capacity matrix for both the electrical and the thermal part, and the matrix \(A \in\mathbb {R}^{n \times n}\) is the conductivity matrix for both the electrical and the thermal part. Linear parametric models in statespaceform were constructed based on the discrete data provided by MAG, resulting from a finiteintegration technique (FIT). As an example we consider a parametric thermal package model, see Figure 12. When considering meshes that are topologically equivalent for different package thicknesses p, the parametric dependence of the matrices as well as the matrices in the tensor \(\mathcal {F}\) will take the form as
The second term in (6) originates from the linear dependence of dual areas corresponding to the cell edges perpendicular to the thickness, whereas the third term originates from dual areas associated to cell edges tangential to the thickness orientation.
If the parameter p symbolically appears in the model, the system in (5) becomes a parametric model,
where the matrix \(E(p)\), \(A(p)\), \(B(p)\) and each matrix in \(\mathcal {F}(p)\) are in the form of \(M(p)\). Some mathematical calculations are needed to extract the parametric system from the system in (5). However, the calculations are independent of the dimension of the matrices in (5), which makes the calculation very cheap and flexible [22].
Using a robust parametric model order reduction algorithm in [23], a reduced parametric model (8) with the same parametric structure as the full parametric model, in (7), but with much fewer equations, has been derived
By replacing the full parametric system in (7) with the reduced model (8), much simulation time could be saved. Accurate reducedorder models (ROM) were derived for these linear parametric models. Structure preserving models with sufficient accuracy are obtained for nonlinear parametric coupled problems as well. We refer to Figure 13 for the results of the ROM. The relative error of the output produced by the ROM is of the order 10^{−11}.Furthermore, we have constructed a ROM for a Powercell electrothermal model with size \(n=925{,}286\), and \(m=408\) inputs, \(l=816\) outputs. Simulation of such a largescale system with numerous terminals is a hard task for commercial simulation software, e.g., Spectre. The simulation immediately breaks down due to out of memory. We proposed an efficient method: BDSMET [3], which uses the superposition principle to construct a ROM with blockwise sparsity. The size of the ROM is \(r=11{,}519\) and thus almost two orders of magnitude smaller than the Full Order Model (FOM). A most important feature is that the ROM is also much sparser than the ROM obtained using the standard method. With an error less than 10^{−5}, the thermal part of the ROM has been used together with Spectre, and validated to be efficient.
In developing pMOR methods for fast UQ of nanoelectronic, electrothermal models with random variables or stochastic processes, we applied pMOR techniques to a PowerMOS device (Figure 14), provided by MAG, and obtained a parametric reduced order model (pROM) that is of high accuracy over a very large parameter range. We have embedded the parametric reduced model into the Stochastic Collocation Method [24], which proved to be both efficient and accurate.
Figure 14 displays the PowerMOS chip. Figure 15 shows the heating of the chip. We built an order2 pROM for the order1660 FOM of the electrical part, and an order50 pROM for the order11556 FOM of the thermal part. Figure 16 and Figure 17 depict the evolution of the ‘maximal relative error at the outputs’, which is defined as the maximal relative error at all outputs. When the system starts, the maximal relative error is high because the system is hardly heated up (exact values close to zero) and the thermal parts are dominated by modelling error and numerical error. However, as time elapses, the maximal relative error goes down to the order of 10^{−4} and therefore, the dominant physical properties are accurately captured over a large parameter range.
Uncertainty quantification
UGW, BUW, MAG, TUD worked on methods for Uncertainty Quantification and applied the approaches to address variations of material properties as well as in the geometry [25]. Apart from inhouse software of UGW and BUW, interfacing with libraries from Sandia National Laboratories [26] was achieved. In order to demonstrate robustness of an optimization algorithm under uncertainties, a Power Transistor Model was considered as a test example. We reduced the thermal instability by optimizing the geometry within the device layout, while taking both the conductive power losses and shape variations of source/drain into account. In [5] we focused on a shape/topology optimization problem of a power MOS device with three metal layers under geometrical and material uncertainties to reduce the current density overshoot. This problem, occurring in the automotive industry, yields a stochastic electrothermal coupled problem. It is a multifinger MOSFET power transistor with a stripe cell structure, which consist of several thousands of parallel channel devices. The source and drain contacts are located on the top metal finger of the design, as shown in Figure 18. A series of metal stripes and complex via patterns transport the current to drain and away from the sources of the individual channels. Consequently, the multidimensional current flow is governed by a coupled timedependent system of stochastic Partial Differential Equations (PDEs). Its solution enables to investigate the propagation of uncertainties through a 3D model, which affect yield and performance of a power transistor. In particular as parameters \(p(\omega)= [\sigma_{3}(\omega), W_{2} (\omega), {C_{\upsilon}} (\omega), V_{\mathrm{D}} (\omega), V_{\mathrm{S}} (\omega) ]\) are taken, in which the conductivity of the Metal3 layer, \(\sigma_{3}\), the thickness of the Metal2, \(W_{2}\), and the thermal capacitance of the Via12, \(C_{\upsilon}\), and the drain and source contacts are considered, see also Figure 18. Here ω varies over some event space and the probability distributions of the parameters are predetermined.The PDEs are equipped with random Dirichlet boundary conditions that describe the potentials at the drain and source pads.
To reduce the current density overshoots in the area of the contact layer of the power device, as basic randomdependent cost functional
was taken, where the dissipation power \(Q_{\mathrm{e}}\) is analyzed in the area of Metal3 layer \(\mathrm{D} \subset\mathbb{R}^{3}\), and the source voltage term h is represented by the random Dirichlet boundary condition in the area of the source and drain pads \(\Gamma \subset\mathbb{R}^{2}\). The variable υ is defined as \(\upsilon= ({x}, {{p} (\omega )} )\), whereas the weights \(w_{1}\) and \(w_{2}\) refer to known a priori information about objectives.
For the robust optimization one considers a PDEconstrained minimization problem
where \(\eta=3\) was taken. The Stochastic Collocation Method, based on Polynomial Chaos Expansion (PCE) [24, 27], provided a response surface model to estimate the expectation \(\mathbb{E} [ {F({\upsilon})} ]\) and the standard deviation \(\sqrt{{\operatorname{Var}} [ {{F({\upsilon})}} ]}\). Combining with a Topological Derivative Method, we could reduce hot spot phenomena in a robust sense, see Figure 19. The optimization results for a relevant nanoelectronics problem demonstrate that the proposed method is robust and efficient [5].
We finally remark that our implementations are also able to identify dominant parameter contributions to the variance when varying parameters [28].
As a separate action, TUD developed a GUI (Graphical User Interface) for Uncertainty Quantification to easily compare our UQ methods with Monte Carlo simulations and Worst Case Corner Analysis [29]. The last approach is very popular in the semiconductor industry because it is much faster than Monte Carlo. Our UQ implementation exploits sparse grid techniques and can easily deal with up to 20 independent parameters.
Fast fault simulation
NXP, BUW and TU Eindhoven developed a special algorithm for fast fault simulation in NXP’s inhouse circuit simulator Pstar. NXP’s simulator is the best in the world for this functionality [7, 30]. Imperfections in manufacturing processes may cause unwanted connections (faults) that are added to the nominal, ‘golden’, design of an electronic circuit. When considering faults from the point of view of parameter variations this is well in the range of large deviations. In [30] the faulty elements are represented by adding linear conductivities to the circuit. The approach also works for analyzing the effect of additional linear capacitors. However, the main interest is in adding linear conductivities: thus \(p{u}{v}^{T} {x}(t,p)\), where \(p=1/R\), with resistance R, and given vectors u, v, to the system of circuit equations of which the solution becomes \({x}(t,p)\). By fault simulation we simulate all situations: a huge number of new connections of pairs of vectors \(({u},{v})\) and each with many different values of p, up to the regime of large deviations, for the newly added element and comparing the result \({x}(t,p)\) at specific time points with the ‘golden’ solution \(\tilde{x}(t)={x}(t, 0)\) of the faultfree circuit, corresponding with \(p=0\). If the deviation between \({x}(t,p)\) and \(\tilde{x}(t)\) exceeds some threshold, the fault triple \(({u},{v}, p)\), is marked as detectable and is taken out of the list. We also consider ‘opens’ (broken connections). A strategy is developed to efficiently simulate the faulty solutions until their moment of detection. The hierarchical structure was enhanced, such that the hierarchical solver could deal with all new elements: note that some new connections may violate the original hierarchical structure of the golden circuit. A clever software solution was developed and is reported in [30]. By this, also the faulty problems could benefit from an enhanced form of hierarchical bypassing. Because each candidate fault is a lowrank modification of the designed circuit an hierarchical variant of the ShermanMorrison formula was exploited. Fast fault simulation is achieved in which the golden solution and all faulty solutions are calculated over the same time step.
The results are stored in a database. This database is of help to first externally diagnose a faulty IC and to identify the candidate circuit submodels where the fault may have happened. After that the IC can be studied further internally. This can help to improve next productions. Moreover, the collection of simulations can also be helpful as a priori check before layouting. NXP can identify locations on a chip that are probably affected by tiny manufacturing accuracies, which case faulty behaviour at predefined time points for measurements.
Inclusion of sensitivity analysis brought speeds up in CPU time of a factor 20 or more. See Figure 20 for an indicative result. Later invoking of faults gave an additional order of magnitude in speed up. By this reduction of simulation time candidate faults could be detected that would have been impossible otherwise because of excessive CPU time [7].
Note that essentially one is looking to the weak spots in the circuit. In our approach the manufacturing process is the immediate cause of the problem. However it can also show up later, due to effects of ageing of the design, or by stress effects due to heating. It is also related to other network problems, e.g., in analyzing traffic behaviour in a city when suddenly a road is blocked, or when a new connection pops up. Our approach can be extended to energy distribution networks, sewage systems, and even to networks that are not constant of size in time.
This algorithm also offers interesting ingredients to combine with Uncertainty Quantification.
Test examples, measurements
The industrial partners NXP, ONN, and ACC did provide various test examples. The test cases cover realisticsize power MOS devices at constant temperature and in ET coupling mode; a driver chip with multiple heatsources; a smart power driver test chip with thermal sensor; an 8shaped inductor with surrounding circuitry; a fast and reliable model for bondwire heating; RF and electrothermal simulations; reliable RFIC isolation under uncertainty (for floor planning and grounding strategies; this involves onchip coupling effects, chippackage interaction, substrate coupling and the socalled cohabitation factor); multirate circuit examples; silicon test chips for stepbystep testing and validation; transmission line and baluns. All these are found in our industrial problem classes described in the introduction. ACC has prepared several designs, made simulations and realized test boards. They served for step by step study, for comparison to measurements and for validation of the enhanced MAGWEL software, in close cooperation with BUT, NXP and ONN.
As simple example, we mention here test chips that include passive structures (inductances, capacitances, baluns, resonators). These structures, that are easily measurable, are used to validate further EM extraction and model reduction. Simulated results are compared to measurements, EM solver extraction and then with extraction plus netlist reduction in terms of accuracy, memory usage and time simulation.
Conclusion
The unique combination of the nanoCOPS consortium allows to already report the following intermediate, innovative highlights halfway the project, to which all partners have contributed.

The coupling interface with the MAGWEL software has been improved, tested and is operational.

Successful largescale EMheat simulation was achieved.

Gridadaptive multirate circuit simulation was established.

Model Order Reduction was successfully applied to coupled EMheat problems.

Accurate bond wire modelling for fast usage at industry was demonstrated and was validated by measurements.

Uncertainty Quantification was applied to variations of material parameters and geometry and was used in robust topology optimization. Apart from the topics, this at best demonstrates the robustness of the integrated software  to achieve optimization one addresses all parts of the codes.

Innovative methods for improving yield as well as to identify faults were derived.

Advanced measurements environments have been set up both at academia and at industry.

Outcomes have been presented at conferences. Joint papers have been published in various journals.

Interaction between academia and industrial partners addressed a broad range: test examples, new algorithms, implementations, practical use of new methods, ways to improve measurements.
The focus in the second half of the project is on further validation and demonstration of the methods by applying them to the broad range of IC building blocks. Together with the industry partners methodologies are defined how best to use the methods. All three industrial partners started work on reliability and the impact of ageing. Also steps to yield optimization have been developed. Techniques with adjoint approaches are currently introduced. Also inverse problems are addressed. Presentations will be given at SCEE2016, Scientific Computing in Electrical Engineering, http://wwwdev.ricam.oeaw.ac.at/events/conferences/scee2016/.
References
 1.
Janssen HHJM, Benner P, Bittner K, Brachtendorf HG, Feng L, ter Maten EJW, Schöps S, Tischendorf C. The European project nanoCOPS for nanoelectronic coupled problems solutions. In: Russo G, Capasso V, Nicosia G, Romano V, editors. Progress in industrial mathematics at ECMI 2014. Mathematics in industry. vol. 22. Berlin: Springer; 2016.
 2.
Janssen R, ter Maten J, Tischendorf C, Brachtendorf HG, Bittner K, Schoenmaker W, Benner P, Feng L, Pulch R, Deleu F, Wieers A. The nanoCOPS project on algorithms for nanoelectronic coupled problems solutions. In: Schreffler B, Oñate E, Papadrakakis M, editors. Coupled problems in science and engineering VI  COUPLED PROBLEMS 2015. Barcelona: CIMNE  International Center for Numerical Methods in Engineering; 2015. p. 102936. ISBN 9788494392832.
 3.
Banagaaya N, Feng L, Schoenmaker W, Meuris P, Wieers A, Gillon R, Benner P. Model order reduction for nanoelectronics coupled problems with many inputs. In: Proceedings of design, automation and test in Europe (DATE). 2016. p. 3138. Paper 0996.
 4.
Casper T, De Gersem H, Gotthans T, Schoenmaker W, Schöps S, Wieers A. Electrothermal simulation of bonding wire degradation under uncertain geometries. In: Proceedings of design, automation and test in Europe (DATE). 2016. p. 1297302. Paper 0776.
 5.
Putek P, Meuris P, Pulch R, ter Maten EJW, Günther M, Schoenmaker W, Deleu F, Wieers A. Shape optimization of a power MOS device under uncertainties. In: Proceedings of design, automation and test in Europe (DATE). 2016. p. 31924. Paper 0998.
 6.
Schoenmaker W, Meuris P, Strohm C, Tischendorf C. Holistic coupled field and circuit simulation. In: Proceedings of design, automation and test in Europe (DATE). 2016. p. 30712. Paper 0995.
 7.
Tasić B, Dohmen JJ, Janssen R, ter Maten EJW, Beelen TGJ, Pulch R. Fast timedomain simulation for reliable fault detection. In: Proceedings of design, automation and test in Europe (DATE). 2016. p. 3016. Paper 0994.
 8.
Duque Guerra DJ, Schöps S. A fractional step method for the dynamic electrothermal modelling of device structures. IFACPapersOnLine. 2015;48(1):9323.
 9.
Kaufmann C, Günther M, Klagges D, Knorrenschild M, Richwin M, Schöps S, ter Maten EJW. Efficient frequencytransient cosimulation of coupled heatelectromagnetic problems. J Math Ind. 2014;4:1.
 10.
Schoenmaker W, Dupuis O, De Smedt B, Meuris P. Fullycoupled electrothermal power device fields. In: Russo G, Capasso V, Nicosia G, Romano V, editors. Progress in industrial mathematics at ECMI 2014. Mathematics in industry. vol. 22. Berlin: Springer; 2016.
 11.
Baumanns S, Jansen L, SelvaSoto M, Tischendorf C. Analysis of semidiscretized differential algebraic equation from coupled circuit device simulation. Comput Appl Math. 2015;34(3):93355.
 12.
Strohm C, Tischendorf C. Interface model integrating fullwave Maxwell simulation models into modified nodal equations for circuit simulation. IFACPapersOnLine. 2015;48(1):9401.
 13.
Duque D, Schöps S, De Gersem H, Wieers A. nanoCOPS: analytical approach for estimating the heating of bondwires. ECMI Newsletter. 2014;56:701. http://www.mafy.lut.fi/EcmiNL/issues.php?action=viewar&ID=353.
 14.
Nöbauer GT, Mose H. Analytical approach to temperature evaluation in bonding wires and calculation of allowable current. IEEE Trans Adv Packaging. 2000;23(3):42635.
 15.
Duque D, Schöps S, Wieers A. An extended analytical approach for the estimation of the heating of bondwires. In: Russo G, Capasso V, Nicosia G, Romano V, editors. Progress in industrial mathematics at ECMI 2014. Mathematics in industry. vol. 22. Berlin: Springer; 2016.
 16.
Petrzela J, Sotner R, Gotthans T, Drinovsky J, Kratochvil T, Wieers A, Gillon R. Different DC fusing scenarios of encapsulated bonding wires. Accepted for presentation at SCEE2016, Scientific Computing in Electrical Engineering, St. Wolfgang / Strobl, Austria.
 17.
Günther M, editor. Coupled multiscale simulation and optimization in nanoelectronics. Mathematics in industry. vol. 21. Berlin: Springer; 2015.
 18.
Bittner K, Brachtendorf HG. Fast algorithms for adaptive free knot spline approximation using nonuniform biorthogonal spline wavelets. SIAM J Sci Comput. 2015;37(2):B283B304.
 19.
Banagaaya N, Feng L, Meuris P, Schoenmaker W, Benner P. Model order reduction of an electrothermal package model. IFACPapersOnLine. 2015;48(1):9345.
 20.
Benner P, Feng L. Model order reduction for coupled problems. Appl Comput Math Int J. 2015;14(1):322.
 21.
Yue Y, Feng L, Meuris P, Schoenmaker W, Benner P. Application of Krylovtype parametric model order reduction in efficient uncertainty quantification of electrothermal circuit. In: Proceedings PIERS. 2015. p. 37984.
 22.
Feng L, Meuris P, Schoenmaker W, Benner P. Parametric and reducedoder modeling for the thermal analysis of nanoelectronic structures. In: Bartel A, Clemens M, Günther M, ter Maten EJW, editors. Scientific computing in electrical engineering SCEE2014, Wuppertal, Germany. Mathematics in industry. vol. 23. Berlin: Springer; 2016. p. 15563.
 23.
Benner P, Feng L. A robust algorithm for parametric model order reduction based on implicit moment matching. In: Quarteroni A, Rozza G, editors. Reduced order methods for modeling and computational reduction. Springer MS&A series. vol. 9. Cham: Springer; 2014. p. 15985.
 24.
Xiu D. Numerical methods for stochastic computations  a spectral method approach. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2010.
 25.
Putek P, Meuris P, Pulch R, ter Maten EJW, Schoenmaker W, Günther M. Uncertainty quantification for robust topology optimization of power transistor devices. IEEE Trans Magn. 2016;52(3):1700104.
 26.
Dakota 6.3  Algorithms for design exploration and simulation. Albuquerque, NM, USA: Sandia National Laboratories; 2015. https://dakota.sandia.gov/.
 27.
Le Maître OP, Knio OM. Spectral methods for uncertainty quantification. With applications to computational fluid dynamics. Dordrecht: Springer; 2010.
 28.
Pulch R, ter Maten EJW, Augustin F. Sensitivity analysis and model order reduction for random linear dynamical systems. Math Comput Simul. 2015;111:8095.
 29.
Zhang H, Chen TH, Ting MY, Li X. Efficient designspecific worstcase corner extraction for integrated circuits. In: IEEE design automation conference (DAC). 2009. p. 3869.
 30.
Tasić B, Dohmen JJ, ter Maten EJW, Beelen TGJ, Schilders WHA, de Vries A, van Beurden M. Robust DC and efficient timedomain fast fault simulation. Compel. 2014;33(4):116174.
Acknowledgements
This FP7 Collaborative Project nanoCOPS is supported by the European Union in the FP7ICT201311 Programme under Grant Agreement Number 619166 (Project nanoCOPS  nanoelectronic COupled Problems Solutions). For further details see http://www.fp7nanocops.eu/.
Author information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Received
Accepted
Published
DOI
Keywords
 multirate
 model order reduction
 cosimulation
 uncertainty quantification
 powerMOS devices
 RFcircuitry
 bond wires
 coupled problems
 multiphysics
 fault simulation